NOTE: This
is practically a novella (2923 words), but it covers a lot of recent history,
along with some digression into the past. You are not expected
to read it in one sitting. If you care to, and we hope you do,
print it out and read it at your convenience. Your comments are always
welcome, and will be put on the blog with your consent.
The Governor at Day 151:
How to Deal with Rogues
Without Looking Foolish
Henry J. Stern
May 31, 2007
Today being the last day of May, as well as Day 151 of the
Spitzer administration, it is time to take a look at what has happened in
Albany since Inauguration Day..
Many of us who hoped for a change in the culture of cynicism that pervades
state government have been disappointed. Some take out their
annoyance on Governor Spitzer, who has been arrogant in some of his public
statements and naive in some of his dealing with the wily legislature.
In fact the state senate and the assembly were not and are not likely to
adopt most of the governor's reform agenda. It is not in their economic
self-interesst. But the manner in which they were presented and his
early aggressive remarks have made it somewhat easier for the guys to ignore
his wishes. By loose language and unsupported threats, he has weakened
his hold on the high ground, which is necessary when one is dealing with
people, some of whose ethical standards are quite different from yours, not
that you're a saint But most of your sustenance comes from the private
sector, and the State of New York is not your piggy bank..
In the last months, there has been a marked retreat from the belligerence
of the early days. Hopefully, the governor will affect a more diplomatic
approach to the rascals. He does have the problem which afflicts most
reformers: If you really want things to be better, and have pretty
good ideas as to what should be done, how do you persuade them to act in
the public interest?. And how can you suppress your righteous anger
when they are unresponsive?
There are a number of ways to deal with this problem: One is intimidation,
threatening primaries against incumbents who reject your program. That
has worked only once, when Nassau County Executive Tom Suozzi ran a candidate,
Chuck Lavine, a City Council member in Glen Cove, who defeated incumbent
Assemblyman David Sidikman in the 2004 Democratic primary. Predictably,
that successful purge of poor old Sidikman, who hadn't done anything awful
to anyone, generated distaste for Suozzi among the time-servers in Albany,
who supported Spitzer in the 2006 Democratic primary partially because he
was viewed as less hostile to the system than Suozzi.
There were negative signs before Election Day. Spitzer is reported
to have refused to give Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver the honor of placing
his name in nomination at the party convention. That was followed by
Spitzer's scorched-earth policy toward Comptroller Alan Hevesi's failings.
Silver was more considerate of his former colleague, not defending him but
not denouncing him either, waiting for the process to take its course.
The blow-up came over the selection of a new Comptroller. The details
of that struggle need not be recounted here in detail, but it has had a lasting
impact. Spitzer's public statement that Thomas DiNapoli,
a Nassau County Assemblyman for twenty years (and rival of Suozzi in the
2001 Democratic primary for county executive, was "thoroughly and totally
unqualified for the job" remains on the record. DiNapoli and Spitzer
can square off again in 2010, when both men will be up for re-election.
Meanwhile, Spitzer can speculate as to whether he would have been better
off with the wounded but brilliant Hevesi.
Again, we do not know whether Hevesi should have remained Comptroller through
2010, even though he was just re-elected in 2006. It is possible that
he and his staff made other decisions on selection of investments and underwriters
which would not withstand objective scrutiny. It is likely that some
of his employees misused state assets. But the E felony with which
he was charged by the Albany County district attorney to which he pleaded
guilty, was insufficient, in our judgment, to warrant his removal. His acceptance
of the plea bargain, despite his spending hundreds of thousands of dollars
on lawyers, suggests that facts not generally known to the public influenced
his decision to abdicate.
The exclusion of Hevesi from campaign events, even from the acceptance of
the returns on Election Night, before he had been tried or convicted, reinforced
Spitzer's reputation for ruthlessness. His unsuccessful foray into
picking a successor caused a heavy loss in stature. It placed Speaker Silver
in the position of defending his members from the governor, even as he was
(or was not) breaking his word. The panel itself was sadly flawed.
By approving City Finance Commissioner Martha Stark and failing to approve
former City Finance Commissioner, City Councilmember and State Commissioner
of Taxation and Finance Andrew Eristoff, the panel departed from standards
of professional competence and wandered into the minefield of race and gender.
As luck would have it (Rule 17-A), one of the ablest Assemblymen, Pete
Grannis, known for honesty and fairness, who would have made a fine Comptroller,
had already been tapped by the governor to be Commissioner of Environmental
Conservation.
The next area of conflict was the budget. Here the assembly added hundreds
of millions to Spitzer's budget and the Republican senate added hundreds
of millions more. The exact figures are always in dispute. Both sides
claimed victory, as is often the case with compromises. Experts like
the Citizens Budget Commission agreed with business groups that the
budget was too high to begin with, rising at three times the rate of inflation.
Governor Spitzer added billions of dollars for education, bowing to a court
decision which was arguably ultra vires. He said that he had imposed
standards of accountability on spending the money, but there is no reason
to believe that any money will be withheld. Accountability, like
transparency, is a buzzword that can be interpreted any way its users choose.
Put simply, it is unreal. On top of that, the Senate added more hundreds
of millions to prevent Long Island school districts from the possibility
of losing state aid. Reason: there are seven Republican senators from
Long Island. Without the two counties of Nassau and Suffolk, the senate
would have a Democratic majority.
That brings us to Governor Spitzer's other political decision, appointing
Senator Michael Balboni of Nassau to the position of Deputy Secretary to
the Governor for Homeland Security, was intended to, and did, reduce Senator
Bruno's Republican majority, which had been three seats, (34-28 in a 62-member
body). If there is a tie in the senate it would be broken by the Democratic
Lieutenant Governor, David Paterson. To fill the Balboni vacancy, Spitzer
contributed money and campaigned enthusiastically for Craig Johnson, a Democratic
county legislator. Johnson defeated the Republican, and Bruno's majority
was cut to 33-29.
The position of Deputy Secretary to the Governor, which Balboni accepted
out of frustration with his role in the senate, was further undermined by
the appointment of Sean Patrick Maloney as First Deputy Secretary.
Maloney was a splinter candidate for Attorney General in the Democratic primary,
raising millions of dollars from out-of-state gays. He received nine
per cent of the vote. Maloney made a good impression in the campaign
and was a reasonable appointment. But making him First Deputy, thus downgrading
the other seven, is childlike, unless the seven report to him, in which case
their jobs are substantially less important than the position of State Senator.
Balboni may have been persuaded to take the position by being told how many
lives he could save by fighting terrorism on the front line as Deputy Secretary.
He certainly was not told he would be under a First Deputy Secretary to the
Governor. Balboni is a decent and able person, and we assume he will
do a good job if he is allowed to by his new supervisors.. We also
hope that we are not attacked by terrorists, even though that would substantially
lessen his role. The question of whether Balboni had a responsibility
to the party that elected him for 18 years to the state senate and the assembly
is for him to contemplate, perhaps with the other young and anonymous deputy
secretaries.r.
DIGRESSION: The Balboni affair reminds evokes a similar situation in
1965, when Lyndon Johnson got Arthur J. Goldberg to resign from the Supreme
Court of the United States to become US Ambassador to the United Nations
on the ground that only he could bring peace to the world. In fact,
LBJ's motive was to create a vacant seat (which had traditionally been known
as the Jewish seat since it was occupied by Justices Benjamin N. Cardozo
(1932-38) and Felix Frankfurter (1939-62) so he could nominate his buddy
Abe Fortas to the court. Frankfurter was not the literal successor
to the great Justice, Louis D. Brandeis (1916-39). When Brandeis retired,
President Roosevelt appointed Justice William O. Douglas (1939-75), who served
longer than any other justice who ever sat on the High Court...
President Johnson tried this maneuver again in 1967 when he promoted Ramsey
Clark to the position of Attorney General. In order to avoid the appearance
of conflict of interest, Ramsey's father, Justice Tom C. Clark (1949-67),
retired from the court on his son's appointment. This created another
vacancy, which LBJ sought to fill with the appointment of Homer Thornberry,
a judge and former Congressman from Texas. That was part of a deal
under which Earl Warren would retire, Fortas would fill the vacancy as chief
justice, and Thornberry would take Fortas' seat. The deal collapsed
when Fortas got into trouble. Ramsey Clark, who lost a challenge to
Senator Jacob Javits in 1974, wandered further and further and has since
represented both Saddam Hussein and the Palestine Liberation Organization
in the case of the murder of Leon Klinghoffer, who was shot and pushed into
the Mediterranean Sea. Clark lost both cases.
BACK FROM THE PAST: The achievements of the first five months of the
Spitzer administration should not be ignored. A high point was the
governor's executive order, issued January 1, setting standards of conducts
for the executive branch of state government. In the first blush of
co-operation with the legislature, both houses passed a civil commitment
bill for sex offenders, and an ethics reform bill of limited scope.
The election of Craig Johnson to the senate was a political victory, but
Spitzer made an implacable enemy of Joe Bruno, who will remain majority leader
unless two or more of his senators defect to the Democrats or take state
jobs under Spitzer. Although Bruno is not universally popular among
Republicans, and has reached the age of 77 (fifteen years older than the
speaker and thirty years older than the governor), there has been relative
peace in the GOP for the last few months. In addition, once they have made
their move, defectors are useless and often perceived as rats, unless there
is a strong ideological reason for their change in loyalties.
Another Spitzer achievement was a healthcare provision in the budget which
raised the maximum family income limit for state-subsidized health insurance
for children (Child Health Plus, a program initiated under Governor Cuomo)
from $51,630 to $82,600, the highest such limit in the United States.
The governor kept a campaign promise by supporting a bill to allow gay marriage,
while recognizing that its passage by both houses is an event unlikely to
occur in the near future.
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts is now the only jurisdiction in the United
States where full gay marriages are performed, although a few other states,
primarily in New England, recognize civil unions. A few more states recognize
domestic partnerships. However, in today's Sun, p4.c5 in
a story about legislative public hearings, Speaker Silver, in response to
a question as to whether he would hold such hearings on gay marriage, said,
"There are only so many public hearings that we're going to do."
In other words, don't hold your breath.
The governor's setbacks primarily consist of things not done by the legislature,
in part because of his manner, in much larger part because the legislators
receive substantial contributions from those who oppose reform for their
own economic reasons. One thing that seems to have been learned is
that serious matters cannot be negotiated in public, despite the demands
of reform purists. It is hard enough to negotiate to resolve differences
on a complex issue without being required to hold the negotiations in the
Colosseum, a spectacular locale to which every place today which has full
electronic media access is comparable. Open meetings laws notwithstanding,
open negotiation is an oxymoron.
The first five months have been inconclusive. We expect higher standards
from a reform governor who was an editor of the Harvard Law Review than we
do from some of the rascals with whom he must deal. But whereas we
can condescend to officials because we are outsiders, his game plan must
be different. He must at least simulate respect for his colleagues,
even if that makes him appear insincere to us. Rule 28-A is "Always
tell the truth when you can." The hard part is knowing when you can
or can't.
Politics is inherently a hypocritical business, in some part because it requires
frequent co-operation between people who compete with each other, do not
respect each other, and are often aware of each other's personal and professional
ethical lapses. They also have to appeal to a variety of groups in their
own constituency, some of whose demands are contradictory to the needs of
other local groups. And they must compete with people who have more
money than they do, whether earned, inherited, married or stolen.
For a first semester report card, we would give the governor an "S"
satisfactory grade for good intentions and sincere effort. The problem
comes in the issue: "works and plays well with others" There one would have
to give an N "needs improvement", which is somewhere between S and U "unsatisfactory".
Well, how do you work and play with others whose game plan relates to the
content of their pockets, or to their continuance in office, rather than
the public good..
There are New Yorkers whorespect the electric chair, and those that
decry it, some people believe life begins at conception, others say at birth,
while still others think the fetal heartbeat is the start of viability. Many
are of the opinion that people should marry someone of the opposite
gender, while many others believe in total gender choice. Elected officials
who may have to cast votes on these and other controversial issues desire
to insulate themselves from the strain of primaries and the fear of competitive
elections. To do this, they pass complex election laws with burdensome
requirements and draw district lines like city walls to exclude challengers.
Self-preservation is said to be the first law of nature. It is
the one law that state legislators most faithfully observe.
ne suggestion, though, is not to call a person who is being selected as your
CFO "thoroughly and totally unqualified" for the office he is about
to hold. We certainly wouldn't say that about an IRS agent even
if we believed it to be so.
You were quoted as telling Michael Goodwin of the News: "I'm the governor
of the state. I'll be Lyndon Johnson. I'll craft the deals and
I'll get the job done. You will write and I will do. That's why
you're there and I'm here."
We are certain that Mr. Goodwin was put in his place. If only everyone
understood their place,, the governor's job would be easier. But so
far, the only comparison to be made with Lyndon Johnson is in the governor's
use of what the New York Times calls "earthy language."
Johnson had the gift of persuasion as well as intimidation. When he
said, "I don't trust a man unless I have his pecker in my pocket," he didn't
say he could get the man's pecker in his pocket without his even noticing
it. You could call him a pickpecker. LBJ learned some of that at Southwest
Texas State Teachers College? Did Spitzer pick it up at Princeton?
Yes, I know reverse snobbery is just as bad as snobbery, and I don't really
dislike any of these characters. There is a saying, not one of my rules
"If you can't beat them, join them". I don't recommend that, remember
the
smiling
young lady of Niger. To win, you must operate at a so much higher level
than your opponents that the force of public opinion will be with you, may
it be so, and the media will torment them until they come around, more or
less. Don't publicly argue with people of lesser rank, it demeans you and
enhances their importance. The people of New York State elected you,
by a wide majority, to run the executive branch, which is most of the government.
Concentrate on that responsibility. See what the dysfunctionals can
do on their own.
Five months completed, 43 to go. Your term is a bit more than 10% over.
And don't be too certain about re-election, especially if Mr. B (for Big)
runs. He could do it if he wanted to. Among the governors who
failed to win a second term r were Bill Clinton, Averell Harriman and Alfred
E. Smith (although Clinton and Smith came back after their losses).
You are doing all right as governor, you are by no means failing, and you
are better than your adversaries.You want to be a first-rate governor, maybe
you want to be President some day. To be considered for that, you
must be statesmanlike. That is a quality that money and intellect alone
cannot buy. But it can be achieved from within..
In the New York vernacular, be a mensch.
#378 5.31.07
2923wds