Incoming Speaker Nancy Pelosi
Finds Her Troops Have Mutinied
As Hoyer Beats Murtha, 149-86
By Henry J. Stern
November 17, 2006
The struggle for the majority leadership of the House of Representatives,
a powerful position recently held by Tom DeLay , made the top of page one
of today's Times in a story by
Carl
Hulse accompanied with a four-column picture featuring the unhappy couple.
PELOSI REBUFFED OVER HER CHOICE FOR HOUSE POST. The surprising margin, in
a secret ballot before which both sides claimed victory, was 149 for Hulse
and 86 for Murtha, t
There have been four editorials on this subject in two days: Times: Fri
SPEAKER
PELOSI TEMPTS DISASTER; Post Thu
MS.
PELOSI & MR. PAYOFF, News Thu
PELOSI'S
POISON PICK; Sun Fri:
PELOSI'S
FIRST DRAMA. All the New York papers, both the liberal and the conservative
ones, agreed that Hoyer was the more suitable candidate.
A long profile of the new majority leader, Steny Hoyer, in today’s Times
on A26, by Kate Zernike,
A
CULTIVATOR OF LOYALTIES, gives the story of his rise in Maryland politics.
It was fascinating to read of his early interactions with Nancy D'Alesandro,
only daughter of the Democratic boss and Baltimore mayor from 1947 to 1959,
Tommy D'Alesandro. One of Nancy's five brothers, Tommy III, was mayor
of Baltimore from 1967 to 1971. She and young Steny Hoyer were
both Congressional interns, and later served on the staff of Maryland Senator
Daniel Brewster. Nancy met Paul Pelosi in Washington, DC. When
they married, they moved to his home town, San Francisco, where Nancy she
won a special election to Congress in 1987, succeeding the late Sala Burton,
who had replaced her husband Philip Burton, who died in1983. Nancy defeated
a San Francisco supervisor, Harry Britt, who ran on her left.
Pelosi’s next encounter with Hoyer came in 2001, when with the help of the
large California delegation, she defeated him for minority whip. She
advanced to minority leader when Dick Gephardt left that position to run
for President in 2004. Gephardt's candidacy crashed and burned
in the Iowa primary, after which he withdrew from the race. When she
became minority leader, Hoyer became whip, and they served together through
2006, when happy days returned in November, and the speakership came within
reach.
Whether Pelosi was injured or rescued from further disaster by Hoyer's defeat
of Murtha is disputed in three columns in the Post, two today and one yesterday.
Today,
John
Podhoretz writes PELOSI'S FIRST FLOP, but he sees the Democratic infighting
as healthy, and the result as good for their party.
Deborah
Orin-Eilbeck's column, CALL HER 'NANCY SHREW'? is a gripping exercise
in political abuse, much of which appears to be at least partly justified
by what we have heard of the facts. Read it, whether you agree or not.
Ms. O.-E. is the Washington bureau chief of the Post., and recently added
Eilbeck to her by-line, she was a fierce critic of President Clinton. In
yesterday’s Washington Post,
Robert
V. Novak, of Valerie Plame fame, writes; HER 1st MISTAKE: Pelosi’s Foolish
Embrace of Murtha. Novak predicted Murtha’s defeat a day in advance.
The political effect of this unseemly intraparty squabble will play out over
the months to come. In any circumstances, leading Democrats has been
described as herding cats, which is to say that it is almost impossible.
Ms. Pelosi should not be a victim of sexist stereotyping, but she does run
that risk if her actions are stereotypical.
To us, the dismissal of Jane Harman, ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence
Committee, and the substitution of the impeached Federal judge Alcee Hastings
as chair of the Committee is a more grievous action, which is even more likely
than the Hoyer-Murtha grudge match to earn the Democratic Party public contempt
on the issue of integrity. The dispute is likely to result in the selection
of a third party, who has not had Mr. Hastings rare experience of being impeached
and removed from office for official corruption. But since Ms. Pelosi's
major purpose is to derail Ms. Harman, her California rival, she would probably
settle for another candidate as long as she obtained revenge for whatever
slight Ms. Harman had inflicted on her delicate persona, possibly even voting
for Mr. Hoyer in 2001.
Lord Acton said, and everyone in our business knows, that power corrupts.
It took the Gingrich revolution about a dozen years to decay into Abramoff
and DeLay and Cunningham and Ney and Foley and other lesser known villains.
Ms. Pelosi, in pushing Murtha of K Street and the impeached judge Hastings,
seems, presumably unintentionally on completing the destruction of her party's
reputation for integrity a far shorter period.
To many Americans, the 2008 elections are extremely important. The
differences between the parties on economic and social issues are substantial,
and the selection and confirmation of moderate Federal judges is crucial.
These important issues should not be jeopardized by the vagaries of a latter
day Lady Macbeth. We hope that this week's trauma will restore the
Speaker-to-be to the arms of reason and fairness, so that she and her colleagues
can justify the confidence the American people have placed in them.
#330 11.17.06 842wds